Trump Renames Gulf of Mexico: Unpacking the Controversial Shift to ‘Gulf of America’


imagesdall e 2025 02 17 15.51.22 a detailed illustration depicting the gulf of mexico newly labeled as gulf of america on a map. the map shows the surrounding countries the united

The Gulf of Mexico, a significant body of water bordered by the United States, Mexico, and Cuba, has recently been renamed the “Gulf of America” by President Donald Trump’s administration. This decision, formalized through Executive Order 14172, has ignited extensive discussions regarding its historical, political, and international ramifications.

Historical Context and Significance

The Gulf of Mexico has been a cornerstone of cultural and economic development for the surrounding regions. Its rich marine biodiversity supports robust fishing industries, while its strategic location has facilitated trade and cultural exchanges for centuries. The name “Gulf of Mexico” has been internationally recognized, reflecting the shared heritage and geographical ties among the bordering nations.

Executive Order 14172: “Restoring Names That Honor American Greatness”

On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14172, titled “Restoring Names That Honor American Greatness.” This order mandated the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, aiming to “restore American pride” and emphasize the Gulf’s importance to the nation’s economy and heritage. The order also included the reinstatement of the name “Mount McKinley” for Denali, North America’s highest peak.

 

Implementation and Federal Compliance

Following the executive order, the U.S. Board on Geographic Names (BGN), under the Department of the Interior, was directed to update federal maps and documents to reflect the new designation. On February 7, 2025, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum signed Secretary’s Order 3423, officially instructing the BGN to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America in all federal records.

 

Public and Media Reactions

The renaming has elicited a spectrum of responses from the public and media organizations. A Harris Poll conducted in mid-January 2025 revealed that 72% of U.S. registered voters opposed the name change, indicating substantial public resistance.

 

Media outlets have varied in their responses. The Associated Press (AP) chose to continue using “Gulf of Mexico” in its reporting, leading to restricted access to certain presidential events as a consequence of their non-compliance with the new terminology.

In contrast, news website Axios announced it would adopt the term “Gulf of America” in adherence to the executive order.

 

International and Technological Implications

The Mexican government has expressed disapproval of the renaming, emphasizing the historical and cultural significance of the original name. Despite the U.S. federal mandate, international bodies and other nations continue to recognize the body of water as the Gulf of Mexico.

Technological platforms have also been impacted. Google updated its Maps service to display “Gulf of America” for users within the United States, while retaining “Gulf of Mexico” for users in other countries. This change led to user backlash and critical reviews, which Google addressed by moderating comments on the platform.

 

Historical Precedents and Legal Authority

The practice of renaming geographical features is not without precedent. Historically, such changes have occurred to reflect shifts in political power, honor cultural heritage, or assert national identity. In the United States, the U.S. Board on Geographic Names holds the authority to standardize place names for federal use, a power that has been exercised in various instances to reflect contemporary values and political decisions.

Conclusion

The renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America by President Trump’s administration underscores the complex interplay between national identity, historical legacy, and international relations. While intended to bolster national pride, the decision has sparked debates and highlighted the nuanced considerations inherent in altering long-standing geographical names.

For a visual overview of this development, you may find the following news segment informative:

Have any Question or Comment?

Leave a Reply